Just another WordPress site

Writing – How Copywriters Make use of Weasel Words to Cut corners


Copywriters use weasel phrases to plant an idea throughout readers’ minds that is larger than the actual claim being made. Doing work from vague, indeterminate specifics (or no facts at all), the copywriter could generate perceptions that may be absolutely at odds with truth, without making a definite, overall, or concrete claim that may be open to challenge.

But the scenario does it? Well, I have my views on honesty in writing. But needs must as soon as the devil dances. Whether you employ these techniques is up to anyone!

‘Help to’

In conjunction with ‘can’ (see below), ‘help to’ positions your product or service contained in the solution to a problem without having sole credit. For a writing example:

Crunchaflakes can help to lessen weight as part of a calorie-controlled diet

Of course, they can. Just about any food can. With the calorie-controlled approach, it’s simply a problem of adding up the calorie preserving below a set target. Typically the claim is very carefully delineated and hedged about with the copywriter and is neither exclusive nor remarkable. But it lodges the idea of weight loss in the reader’s mind.

‘Can’ and ‘could’

Copywriters use ‘can’ as well as ‘could’ for indefinite statements that they want to sound particular. For example:

While traditional enthusiast heaters have an average duration of 10-15 years, the RoomHeater 32 can last for decades.

Certainly, it can if used fairly sparingly. If used nonstop, its lifetime would be a lot shorter. Caveat emptor!

A large amount

Look again at the example of this above. What period can ‘decades’ actually denote? Dunno, but it sounds like ages rapid just as words like ‘dozens’, ‘hundreds’, and ‘thousands’ could be seen as big quantities.

Strictly discussing, 101 is ‘hundreds’ instructions it’s 1. 01 countless, which is more than one and therefore múltiple. If you’re uncomfortable with that, adhere to 200 and above, which can be definitely more than one hundred. ‘Hundreds’ sounds bigger than ‘217’.


Closely related is the phrase ‘fraction’, as in ‘now on offer at a fraction of the authentic price’. 99/100ths is a portion, but those reading your current copywriting will think of the people they learned at university, like 1/2, 1/3, and also 1/4, which will make them consider you’re offering a huge discount.

Relative improvement

Whiter pearly whites. Improved search engine rankings. Increased sales. Better hair. Whatever it is most likely offering to do, make it comparative and unquantified, not definite and specific. That way, the rest of the tiniest improvement fulfils often the promise.

Yes, of course, my very own copywriting will increase your gross sales. I guarantee it. By means of up to 50%.

‘Up to’

‘Up to’ or ‘as much as is used if you wish to add a numerical as well as statistical claim to your writing, but can only substantiate the item within a certain range.

For instance, you might be copywriting about a provider that gets people income tax rebates. Let’s say that an average of, people get rebates connected with around 10% of their payments, but some have received 50%. In place of quoting the average, or the array, you can say ‘customers have achieved rebates of as much as 50%’.

All you’re really telling is that the rebate is in the collection of 0%-50%, but it’s the higher number that will stick in householder’s minds. Very few will infer the corollary, which is ‘some customers got nothing.

Observe that the ‘up to amount must be honest: it may be abnormal or exceptional, but it has to be achievable.

‘Over’ and ‘more than

Closely related to ‘up to’, ‘over’, and ‘more than making numbers noise larger than they are. For example, ‘over 50%’ sounds bigger than ‘51%’. When given an obscure numerical range by the sales letter writer, people tend to overestimate. (If you want them to underestimate, make use of ‘under’ or ‘less than. )

Watch out for using the two ‘up to’ and ‘more’ together, which results in non-sense copywriting:

Save up to $50 or maybe more!

Here, the $50 will be neither a minimum nor a highest, just an arbitrary point in an entirely undefined range. Although the viewers may latch on to the fifty dollars, blurring the meaning twice implies more confusion rather than considerably more impact in your copywriting.

‘As much as’ and ‘as little as

For a rhetorical twist, copywriters use ‘as much as or ‘as little as to entail the figure they’re citing is particularly high or minimal. For example:

The iPhone is now accessible for as little as $45 per month.

That suggests that $45 is minimal, but with no frame connected with reference to substantiate the promise.

Reported beliefs

Tom Albrighton is now regarded as the best pro writer in the UK.

Sounds fantastic, isn’t going to it? But who’s carrying it out? David Ogilvy, as well as my mum?

The use of the recurring case, which omits the basics of the verb, allows the particular copywriter to say something is made without specifying who’s carrying it out. With verbs such as ‘thought’ or ‘believed’, copywriters can easily put out a claim that could be completely unsubstantiated, simply by expressing that someone thinks is actually true.

Copywriters also use subjective nouns such as ‘concerns’ (usually ‘growing’), ‘speculation’ (often ‘intense’ due to being ‘fuelled’), or perhaps ‘allegation’ (probably ‘fresh’) to have a sense that something’s cooking food without naming the gourmet.

This ploy is very widely used in political journalism, usually to report an ‘off the record’ sentiment from your genuine source. A typical word might begin with ‘Critics in the President now believe… ‘.

Consider the following quote from your UK Guardian, which delivers all the techniques together within a sentence:

The disclosures will probably fuel growing concern the fact that the prince is continuing to help interfere in politics is important when many believe he really should remain neutral if he/she wishes to become king.

Who might be concerned, and why do the disclosures fuel their fears? Who are the ‘many’ who all believe Prince Charles really should remain neutral? What is the factico basis for saying that they might not succeed to the tub, or that his legs are conditional on his actions? What, actually, is being mentioned here?

Nothing. But it seems good.

Rhetorical reinforcement

Copywriters use words such as ‘clearly’, ‘surely’, and ‘self-evidently’ to make an assumption sound like a conclusion. These kinds of rhetorical words add pounds to a statement that may not basis on fact. ‘Surely often the recession is now drawing a close? ‘ It may be, as well as it may not – the pro writer hasn’t actually said in any case, but readers think they get.

Unprovable superlatives

The Computer games entitled ‘The best ordinary album in the world… ever! ‘ and similar highlighted often the useful fact that superlatives usually are unprovable.

Suppose you start expounding on your firm as a ‘leading local widget maker’. Currently including firms who produce other things as well as widgets? Or merely widget specialists? Or just neighborhood widget specialists?

What’s more, how does one define ‘leading’? Do you easily sell most widgets? Make nearly all money from widgets? Or merely make the best widgets? As well as you just one of the best at doing widgets?

It really doesn’t topic, because the only thing followers will remember is ‘leading’. They won’t be querying your personal definition.

Read also: https://twothirds.org/category/digital-marketing/